change matrices (reversed)

docs/benchmark.md

@@ -94,12 +94,12 @@ No filter vs filter (iterative)           |  No filter vs filter pcr (iterative)
 
 No filter vs filter (parasplit)           |  No filter vs filter pcr (parasplit)   |  No filter vs both (parasplit)
 :-------------------------:|:-------------------------:|:-------------------------:
-![](images/chr3_102.png)  |  ![](images/chr3_87.png)   | ![](images/chr3_70.png)
+![](images/chr3_102.png)  |  ![](images/chr3_1a.png)   | ![](images/chr3_1b.png)
 
 
 No filter vs filter (cutsite)           |  No filter vs filter pcr (cutsite)   |  No filter vs both (cutsite)
 :-------------------------:|:-------------------------:|:-------------------------:
-![](images/chr3_109.png)  |  ![](images/chr3_14.png)   | ![](images/chr3_64.png)
+![](images/chr3_2a.png)  |  ![](images/chr3_2b.png)   | ![](images/chr3_2c.png)
 
 We still have the line on the diagonal for the filtering option, same as with normal alignment, regardless of the color which is depending of which condition is place as the first or second matrix in the formula, and intensity of color which is higher for parasplit and cutsite, due to their high number of contact.